Prepared for Ministry of Environment,
Local Government & Rural Development,
Government of Pakistan

Arshad Zaman Associates (Pvt.) Ltd.
Economic & Financial Consultants
January 25, 200

Annex 1 Study Terms of Reference

Annex 1 Study Terms of Reference

A Study of the Contribution of Private Sector and NGOs towards NCS Implementation as part of the Mid Term Review of Pakistan national Conservation Strategy

In line of the overall NCS MTR Objectives, the study will be conducted under the following Terms of Reference.

a) TORs for Private Sector

• Identify private sector investments/projects in the environmental management and greening of the pertinent sectors.

• Identify the key stakeholders/informants for the environment in the private sector at national and provincial level such as:

  1. Federal and Provincial Chambers of Commerce and Industry

  2. Multinationals

  3. Banks, etc.

• Develop framework for Focus group discussion workshop in collaboration with the MTR Co-ordinator. The discussions should be built around:

1. Sustainable development health check (major conservation and sustainable development improvements and their reasons)

2. Where the private sector feel their own actions have been able to make progress in sustainable development

3. The signals that have enabled them to do this – policies, legal changes, fiscal changes, market demands, international campaigns, sources of extra financing – and how these were linked to NCS

4. The mechanisms that they themselves have adopted – coded of practice, international links, etc.

5. Major challenges and constraints for further improvements (external sources and within their own organisations)

6. Recommendations for future

• Develop a detailed work plan for conducting the Focus group discussion workshops with timeframe, in consultation with the MTR Co-ordinator;

• Organise and facilitate focus group discussion workshops designed for key informants in the private sector;

• Document the proceedings and findings of the Focus group discussion workshops.

• Develop and follow a schedule of communicating and giving update to the MTR Co-ordinator on the proceedings of data/information collection.

b) TORs for NGOs Sector

• Identify the NGOs working in the environment and social development sector at national and provincial level. The list of key informants in the NGOs sector will be finalised in consultation with the MTR Co-ordinator;

• Develop framework for Focus group discussion workshops in collaboration with the MTR Co-ordinator. The discussions should be built around:

1. A sustainable development health check (major conservation and sustainable development interventions and their impacts)

2. Where the NGOs feel their own actions have been able to make progress in sustainable development

3. The signals that have enabled them to do this – policies, legal changes, fiscal changes, market demands, international campaigns, sources of extra financing- and how these were linked to NCS

4. The mechanisms that they themselves have adopted – coded of practice, international links, etc.

5. Major challenges and constrains for further improvements (external sources and within their own organisations )

6. Recommendations for future

• Develop a detailed work plan for conducting the Focus group discussion workshops with timeframe, in consultation with the MTR Co-ordinator;

• Organise and facilitate focus group discussion workshops designed for key informants in the NGO sector;

• Document the proceedings and findings of the focus group discussion workshops.

• Develop and follow a schedule of communicating and giving update to the MTR Co-ordinator on the proceedings of data/information collection.

Duration for completion of this study is 6 weeks.

Attachment 1 TORs for Mid Term Review of the Pakistan NCS

Terms of Reference for the Mid Term Review (MTR) of the Pakistan National Conservation Strategy (NCS).

BACKGROUND

A 1998 review of strategies for sustainability carried out for the World Bank observed that national sustainable development strategies are imperative in that they provide a framework for analysis and a focus for debate on sustainable development. In addition, they institutionalize processes for negotiation, mediation and consensus building, for issues which are inherently conflictual. Furthermore, they facilitate planning and the implementation of action which can change or strengthen values, knowledge, technologies and institutions with respect to priority issues. Strategies can assist countries [to] solve interrelated economic, social and environmental problems by developing their capacities to treat them in an integrated fashion… Cross-sectoral strategy initiatives…provide a foundation from which a national sustainable development strategy can be developed.

The Pakistan National Conservation Strategy (NCS) situated Pakistan’s socio-economic development within the context of a national environmental plan. The NCS began with a two year start-up phase, followed by three years of preparation, during which a strategy document was prepared, reviewed, revised and submitted to cabinet for approval. Pakistan’s NCS was approved by cabinet in March 1992, and has been regarded as one of the largest and most comprehensive document of its kind in the world. The authors and stakeholders of the document endeavoured to make this the central document against which sustainable development in Pakistan would be measured. The main implementation phase was launched with donor conference in January 1993, although some implementation began in 1991, with allocations in the federal budgets of 1991-92 and 1992-93.

The strategy has been commonly referred to as more than just a product, but a process based on a participatory methodology that had the net effect of creating an "environmental movement" within Pakistan, committed to implementing its goals and objectives. The development is key to the central tenet of the NCS, which postulates that documents and policies do not make change, only people do.

The NCS has three macro objectives:

1. Conservation of natural resources;

2. Sustainable development; and

3. Improved efficiency in the used and management of these resources.

Achievement of these objectives is contingent on the viability of the three key operating principles: achieving greater partnership in development and management, merging environment and economics in decision-making; and focusing on durable improvements in the quality of life of Pakistanis.

The NCS contained three sections. The first, Pakistan and the Environment, addressed the global environmental context, Pakistan’s resources use and environmental impacts, and existing institutions and policies related to the environment.

After outlining the environmental problems and the means of mitigating them, the second part, Elements of the National Conservation Strategy, focuses on opportunities for improvement in the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors.

Part three, Implementation Arrangements, identified 14 core theme areas for priority implementation, along with the detailed commitment needed by government; NGOs and the private sector over ten years 1991-2001:

• maintaining soils in croplands

• increasing irrigation efficiency

• protected watersheds

• supporting forestry and plantations

• restoring rangelands and improving livestock

• protecting water bodies and sustaining fisheries

• conserving biodiversity

• increasing energy efficiency

• developing and deploying renewables

• preventing and abating pollution

• managing urban waste

• supporting institutions for common resources

• integrating population and environment programmes, and preserving the cultural heritage

From these core themes, 68 programmes were identified. Each programme was presented in detail with communication, extension, research and training components, as well as long-term goals, outputs, and the resource investments required. The NCS indicated how to integrate these programmes into existing and proposed national, sectoral and subsidiary plans. It then proposed building institutions to support the action agenda and implementation plan, paying particular attention to federal-provincial leadership, increasing inter-agency cooperation, enhancing departmental capacities, improving district level coordination, involving the corporate sector, and cooperation with communities and NGOs. Community-based management is identified as the key means of meeting these commitments. The report called on government, NGOS and donors to support and nurture local participatory organizations for the management of common resources throughout the country.

The Pakistan NCS has been called ‘over-ambitious in scope’,, and early implementation plans were scaled down to more practical dimensions. Nevertheless, as one of the most comprehensive early National Conservation Strategies, it broke new ground as a planning document for the country’s future sustainable development, and became model for other countries in South Asia.

An NCS Mid Term Review Committee, comprising The Environment Section of the Planning Commission, the NCS Unit of the Ministry of the Environment, IUCN and the Sustainable Development Policy Institute, has met during the second half of 1998 to develop terms of reference of the NCS Mid Term Review.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES OF THE MID TERM REVIEW

This section aims to answer the following questions:

1. Why? What is the review trying to achieve?

2. For whom? Who is going to use the results of this review?

3. What is going to be assessed?

In order to articulate a purpose, the important considerations were: do we want to generate a rationale that the context and circumstances have changed so much that we need another NCS – OR do we want to refocus and reprioritizes our sustainable development process in a more effective direction – OR do we want it to act as a signpost that warns our implementing and supporting institutions about the major gaps and shortfalls in our approaches --.

Purpose

Keeping in view the time and magnitude of effort that went into the development process of current NCS, the NCS Mark 2 seems to be an unrealistic and untimely endeavour. Hence a more appropriate target that can be achieved through this exercise would be:

The NCS MTR will enable the stakeholders (government, civil society and supporting institutions) to take stock of the current situation and take necessary steps for mid-course correction

Specific Objectives

1. To assess the progress achieved since the adoption of the NCS, taking into account all the influential factors.

2. To analyse and collate lessons learned so far, draw conclusions and formulate recommendations regarding adjustments of NCS as a holistic and integrated strategic guideline for sustainable development in Pakistan.

Objective No. 1: This would entail: achievements with regard to the core programme areas; institutional development; capacity development; legal framework development; policy development; (financial instruments, fiscal incentives, monetary and credit policy links, sustainable trade policy). The above will be approached through an assessment of public sector programmes, donor funded programmes and projects and initiatives undertaken by NGOs and private sector organizations.

Objective No. 2: It clearly suggests that the MTR should be seen as a forward-looking study. In examining the achievements and problems of the past, it should point clearly towards the future in its recommendations. It should offer clear direction on the following questions:

• to what extent should the NCS be reformulated, refocused or rewritten to take into account new developments and changes in the context?

• what should be the future role of supporting institutions, including national and provincial governments, donors, NGOs and others?

In the above context some key questions have been identified by the PEP Steering Committee for MTR (Appendix 1). These will be widely circulated in order to seek comments from as many stakeholders as possible.

METHODOLOGY

For a meaningful review of the NCS, following tasks are envisaged:

1. AGREE ON AN ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK for COVERING CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES - both to encompass the many dimensions of sustainable development, and to provide a rigorous ‘filing system’ for the varied findings on NCS progress, which will be evident at many levels such as inputs made into and outputs achieved from NCS implementation. In addition, to assess whether sustainable development is being achieved, we need to assess the actual outcome (or impacts) of the activities. Or, if impacts are not yet evident (many will take time to appear), we need to assess the quality of the various processes that help to make the transition to satisfactory outcomes. If we can assess both of these so much the better.

2. FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS ON THE CHANGING CONTEXT, AND ON PROGRESS AND NEW PRIORITIES IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT – issues not really covered by the NCS – climate change, globalisation of markets, new international obligations, etc. explain. We need many perspectives on this, to regroup the priorities. Furthermore, a contextual discussion will help to focus and revise the sustainable development analytical framework; and it will reveal people who have useful information, for later detailed interviews, etc

3. REVIEW DEVELOPMENT OF THE MAIN INSTITUTIONS PROPOSED BY THE NCS – the institutions provide the only continuity and ‘glue’ for the NCS. Their work defines, de facto, how the NCS is evolving. A lot has been achieved in setting new institutions up, and it is time to take stock of how they are working – individually and together. Furthermore, each institution is facing constraints, which need to be identified and removed for further progress

4. REVIEW PROVINCIAL AND DISTRICT STRATEGIES – Such a review should also be a helpful exercise for people involved in the provincial strategies, giving them both a change to reflect on their own strategies, and to feed back to the NCS

5. REVIEW LEGISLATION/POLICY CHANGES PERTAINING TO NCS – legislative and/or policy changes and amendments as required for the implementation agenda of the NCS is due consideration here

6. REVIEW MASS AWARENESS ON ENVIRONMENTAL/CONSERVATION ISSUES – the NCS advocates access to information on environmental and conservation issues in order to ensure NCS implementation in a holistic fashion

7. REVIEW FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS PERTAINING TO THE NCS – reflect on the resources allocation and funding allotted by external concessional lending, domestic resource mobilisation, and private investments for NCS implementation

8. CREATE A DATABASE OF ALL PROJECTS RELATED TO THE NCS – Such a database would reveal the changing ‘shape’ of government/donor commitment and investment in different types of SD activities. Seeing the ‘big picture’ may reveal the real-life priorities, which can then be compared to the NCS’s goals and assumptions

9. REVIEW PROGRESS AND IMPACTS OF A SAMPLE OF NCS PROJECTS – Identifying projects which have been successful will reveal what processes are helpful for them (those processes connected to NCS, and other processes that might need to be accommodated b it). Finally, the involvement of PEP personnel in project reviews will give them useful feedback on the actual outcomes of projects and the effective processes that contributed

10. REVIEW THE OVERALL NCS PROCESS AND ITS MANAGEMENT - This should help future promotion of the NCS. It is obviously also needed for adjustment of the whole process in the second half of the NCS term

11. PRODUCE A DRAFT SYNTHESIS REPORT, SUMMARISING FINDINGS AND WAYS FORWARD – to bring together all the evidence in a form which enables debate on findings, recommendations and next steps

12. DEBATE MTR FINDINGS AND PROPOSED WAYS FORWARD – the results of the MTR must be widely ‘owned’ if people are to act on them. Up to this point, there will have been much discussion with individuals and focus groups. Now the ideas need to be put to those at the ‘centre’ of the NCS – the PEP partners, and especially the NCS Unit, and others – including a multi-stakeholders workshop

13. PRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE FINAL NCS-MTR REPORT – to summarise the changed contexts and challenges, to communicate findings and any agreed adjustments to NCS to all NCS stakeholders and to act as a basis for funding discussions with donors

RESPONSIBILITIES AND COMPOSITION OF THE EXTERNAL MTR TEAM

A three-person team will carry out the Mid Term Review. If possible, the Team Leader should be identified early in Phase l and should be involved in designing the data-gathering exercise. It is envisaged that the tem should include at least one senior Pakistani and at least one senior international consultant.

The specific TORs of external team would be:

1. Carry out an extensive review of NCS related documentation in order to develop a clear idea of context and perspective in which NCS was formulated

2. Contribute to data collection process and product

3. On arrival prepare a detailed work plan wit specific activities, roles and responsibilities of each term member

4. Verify the data collected and materials prepared by the Coordinator under the light of key questions posed in the principal MTR TORs.;

5. Carry out in-depth analysis of existing data; interview selected organizations and individuals, and visit selected projects in order to achieve no 4

6. Collate lessons learned so far, draw conclusions and formulate recommendations regarding adjustments of NCS as a strategic guideline for sustainable development in Pakistan

7. Debrief PEP Partners before finalizing the report

8. Prepare the final document in form and context as agreed to with the NCS Unit, Ministry of Environment, Local Government and Rural Development

To undertake the above, at a minimum, the team must include knowledge and experience of:

• Pakistani environment and development issues;

• Public and private sector management structures in Pakistan;

• Multi-sectoral (cross sectoral) strategic analysis;

• Strategizing environmental conservation and sustainable development and relevant monitoring and evaluation approaches at an international level;

• Economic trends and projections and their impact on prioritization of environmental conservation and sustainable development;

• Issues relating to policy analysis, policy setting and policy implementation;

• Institutional capacity development;

• The creation of synergy between the public and private sectors;

• The crosscutting issues of population, education, communications and gender.

TIME PERIOD

It is envisaged that the overall MTR will take approximately 10-12 months starting from May 1999.

Appendix 1 Key Questions for NCS MTR

These questions should be addressed within the context that prevailed during the formulation of the NCS, taking into account any changes that have occurred since. They should also take into account the development of sub-national efforts not foreseen at the time of NCS implementation, and any other unforeseen problems, opportunities and achievements:

• What are the main achievements, effects and constraints on the NCS?

• Are the interest, commitment (political, bureaucratic) and capacity of the NCS partners (GoP, provincial governments, IUCN, NGOs, CBOs, private sector) commensurate with the plan’s requirements?

• Has the spirit and practice of broad-based participation carried over from strategy preparation to implementation?

• Have implementation strategies flowed a flexible and iterative approach?

• Have important cross-and multi-sectoral linkages (population, education, communication, R&D, WID) been developed as planned?

• What investment had been by GoP, Provisional governments, NGOs and Private Sector n the 14 core areas and its related 68 programmes since 1992 July to 1998 June?

• What is the effect, result and impact of this investments?

• Keeping in view the trends in investment since 1992, what level of stress or shift would be required for the future?

• What is the impact of budget reductions and donor diversification?

• Have institutional development and coordination kept pace with the demands of the NCS?

• Has the monitoring/course correcting process of the NCS been effective?

• What is the status and what are the experiences concerning: 1) capacity development in the NGO and private sectors; 2) sector-specific policies and strategies and; 3) monitoring progress in sustainable development?

• How effective is the NCS in facilitating, identifying and addressing gender-related environmental issues through the GoP structure and in civil society?

• How strong is the interest and capacity of project partners for implementing the gender-related environment components of the NCS?

• In general, how effective had the NCS been in promoting sustainable development in Pakistan through government structures and civil society?

• What are the main lessons learned up to 1998?

• What measures are required to [sic.]

• Is the NCS still a relevant prescription for the country’s environmental and development problems?

• What has been achieved in concrete terms at local, provincial and federal levels?

• What has been its impact on legal, legislative and institutional development?

• How did NCS impact on implementation of international treaties that Pakistan is a signatory of [sic.]?

• What is the impact of NCS on donors’ priorities and foreign investment trends?

• Are the Federal Ministries/Division, and provincial governments talking into account the environmental cost of their decisions?

• Are the environmental costs or account stated in monetary terms in decision making?

• Do the federal Ministries/Divisions and provincial governments, take into considerations the various policy recommendations of NCS?

At the conclusion of each focus group discussion, or within 24 hours of it at the latest, the moderator prepared a de-brief of the highlights of the discussion. Two such de-briefs, covering three focus group discussions each, were provided to IUCN within three days of the focus group discussions. For the record, these de-briefs are reproduced in this Annex.

2.1 First De-Brief: Karachi (November 12-13, 1999)

Three focus group discussions, with NGOs, industry, and multinationals, were held in Karachi.

Karachi NGOs (November 12, 1999)

Four participants represented NGOs in Karachi, and two delegates came from NGOs in Quetta.

INITIATIONS OF FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION.

The discussion started on a very positive note by participants contributing their views about the overall environmental challenges being faced by the country. A consensus emerged that sustainable development of the country is imperative.

However, the moderator invited the participants to elaborate specifically on their understanding of improvement towards sustainable development in light of their own initiatives and programmes.

PROJECTS. PROGRAMMES AND INITIATIVES OF NGOs TO CHECK ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION.

All NGOs representatives explicitly dwelt on their ongoing initiatives and projects in terms of programmes on sustainable development.

Six different ventures were clearly identified by participants covering some of the core programme areas being defined by NCS for implementation.

Following are the specific projects undertaken by the NGOs (own initiatives).

1. Balochistan Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project

   Quetta Katchi Abadis Environmental Management Programme

   Training of Environmental Activists.

   The above efforts of Environment Foundation Balochistan Quetta, is a major contribution in protection of water bodies and management of carbon wastes.

2. Awareness creation among the poor community of Lyari about the benefits of clean environment. This is being done through workshops, and visits of trained field staff in different localities.

   A community based NGO, Lyari Community Development Project has undertaken the task of improving awareness of sustainable development.

3. Low cost sanitation, sewerage disposal and aim pollution abatement (transport pollution) programmes.

   Various development projects by OPP (Orangi Pilot Project) are designed to ensure environment friendly surroundings in the low income areas. Urban waste management and abating urban pollution are associated objectives of OPP while focusing on the improvement in the quality of life of slum dwellers.

4. Establishing network for control of water-logging and salinity and construction of small delay action dam at Khar River to recharge ground water in wells of Gadap on self-help basis in collaboration with local kissan committee.

   The above challenging tasks being undertaken by SCOPE (Society for Conservation and Protection of Environment) promises the maintenance of Natural Resources. It also contributes in the development of local institutions of community management.

5. Development of a Graduate Course on Environment and Sustainable Development in Business for MBA students.

   LEAD Pakistan is actively involve in training the professionals in different fields on environmental issues. The formal academic training of future business managers in the core issues of environment and sustainable development is essentially a process of investment that would contribute to successful outcomes in future.

6. Low cost sanitation in Kutchi Abadies around Quetta. Promotion of Hygiene, through latrines and proper disposal of sewerage in Quetta.

Above initiatives of Taraqee Trust Balochistan are based on active mobilisation of communities in order to promote healthy environment and better living conditions.

Karachi Industry (November 13, 1999)

Seven participants represented different industries in Karachi in FGD. Two participants were present as heads of their consultancies whose focus of work is industrial pollution and its abatement. One scientist cum activist came who is actively involved in solution oriented laboratory work for prevention and abatement of Industrial pollution. Three participants represented their respective industries as Incharge of Environment Units in their organisation to check and maintain pollutants within NEQS.

INITIATION OF FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS

The moderator of explained the purpose of FGD to the participants as to what specific sharing of experiences is required from the participants with respect to their work in environment and sustainable development.

PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES IN PURSUANCE OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

The participants very lucidly came up with the nature of environment friendly tasks that they have undertaken to check one of the major sources of pollution that is industrial waste. Following are the identified ongoing projects that are making difference in pursuance of sustainable development of the economy.

1. Primary effluent treatment plant and chromium recovery plant in Mohammad Shafi Tanneries and participation in combined effluent treatment plant in Korangi.

2. Environmental Technology Program for Industry (FPCCI’s Project). Introduction of cleaner production technologies and combined effluent treatment plant – Korangi Karachi.

3. Environmental Technology Programme for Habib Oil Mills (Pvt.) Ltd.

4. Installation of inbuilt system of pollution prevention and upgradation of the same to prevent dust in the surrounding air by production of cement in Dadabhoy Cement Industries Ltd.

5. Series of projects by National Management Consultants to effectively control industrial pollution.

   • Combined Effluent Treatment Plant for Korangi Tanneries

   • Korangi Environmental Uplift Programme

   • Introduction of Cleaner Technologies in Leather Sector

   • Environmental Technology Programme for Industry

6. The Global Environmental Laboratory which is ISO 9002 certified has adopted solution oriented strategy by providing indigenous and cost effective technology being developed in their labs.

7. To achieve NEQS in various industrial sector and inculcate good environmental practices, Century Paper and Board Mills Ltd has adopted various projects. A model project on paper industry is underway to meet this target.

Karachi Multinationals (November 13, 1999)

Eight participants attended the FGDs workshop to express their point of view and actions regarding sustainable development progress and process.

INITIATION OF FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS

The group was very enthusiastic in elaborating upon their work and devices, which they have adopted and technological inputs in compliance of targets and goals to sustainable development. This highly knowledgeable and creative group covered minute details about their respective projects and push factors which have enabled them to achieve their targets.

PROJECTS, PROGRAMMES AND INITATIVES SEEKING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PATH TO ENHANCE THEIR OWN INTEREST TOO.

The following are the identified and discussed in detail, the ongoing projects and process that ensure health, safety and environment of the people and surroundings and follow the sustainable progress in broad spectrum.

1. SmithKline Beecham, a pharmaceutical company is involved in designing and execution of projects to segregate liquid effluents for their two plants. They are also working on treatment plant to meet the required NEQS which is likely to be completed in near future.

2. Engro Pakistan has various environmental protection plants operating in achieving water conservation, energy conservation, pollution abatement and hazardous metal re-use. These projects encompasses various NCS objectives and goals to move towards the broad objective of sustainable development.

3. Attock Cement Pakistan Limited has embarked upon a vital environment friendly venture of cement dust pollution control and modification of dust collector system. This organisation has been selected by EPTI for Environmental Audit.

4. Health and Safety Development of Caltex Oil Pakistan Limited has very useful programmes to manage effluents at service stations and wastewater treatment at oil terminals/ depots.

5. AgrEvo Pakistan (Pakistan) has recently installed an effluent and wastewater treatment plant. They are already running an incinerator for pollution abatement purposes.

6. ABBOTT LABORATOIES have adopted multipurpose policies in line with NCS objectives. Their major area of operation is waste treatment facility and solid waste incineration.

7. HABIB BANK has recently started the environmental campaign which they call as to improve and beautify the attitudinal environment of human beings. The need based training programmes are being designed and undertaken to contribute in awareness creation and education of safe and healthy environment for the benefit of all.

8. HUB POWER COMPANY has tried to ensure the disposal of highly polluted smoke which is emitted by this oil fired plant.

Conclusions

THE SIGNALS THAT STIMULATED ACTIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVERLOPMENT ON THE PART OF NGOs LOCAL INDUSTRY AND MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.

It would be suffice (for debrief) to report that various domestic and international signals have enabled the NGOs and Private sector organisations to take concrete steps for timely check and restrain of environmental pollution and natural resources mismanagement.

DOMESTIC SIGNALS

Government Policies Environmental Protection ordinance and establishment of Environmental Protection Agencies have played key role in NGOs and Private sector initiatives in their concerns for environmental protection and sustainable development.

INTERNATIONAL SIGNALS

External Pressures for better quality products (ISO 9000) and environment friendly and pollution free production process and systems (ISO 14000) largely contributed in local industrial and multinational organisation serious efforts in this regard.

MECHNISIMS THAT NGOs AND PRIVATE SECTOR ADOPTED

Although the detailed discussion on actual mechanism that these organisation have adopted was not possible because of the time constraint but participants highlighted major steps taken by them from establishment of research and development units focusing mainly on environmental issues to setting goals and priorities.

They also explicitly mentioned about there own monitoring and learning processes and mode of actions that has successfully enabled them to move in the direction of sustainable development and comply with NEQS. The consensus emerged, in all three FGDs that direct international linkages has been catalytic and strong stimulant for the development of mechanisms and operational methods.

CONSTRAINS AND CHALLENGES

All the participants raised their concern about the constraints (controllable and uncontrollable) and major challenges. These constraints are encountered at various levels of their initiatives and actions, from conception of projects to materialisation of targets. Following are some of the numerous retarding factors identified by all the participants.

EXTERNAL AND WITHIN ORGANIZATION SOURCES OF IMPEDIMENTS

• The passive role of government in facilitation of NGOs and Private Sectors environment programmes is deemed as the bigger handle by all the participants.

• NCS is unanimously declared as the best national policy guide for sustainable but the pre-requisite of its implementation in letter and spirit are still awaiting realisation in practical terms.

• The social, political and economic conditions of the country have been identified as absolutely non-conducive in facilitating better outcome of NGOs and Private sector projects for sustainable development.

• The dearth of technical and adequately trained and skilled professionals with better knowledge and insight of environmental issues is also very critical. The urgency of availability of technically sound, well equipped professional with knack of innovative ideas and thinking is felt in all FGDs.

• The gaps were also identified in co-ordinated efforts of different NGOs and Private Sector organisations. The concerns were also raised about the fragile and ineffective networking of the various organisations which results in the wastage of resources (financial and material) and has made NGOs and Private Sectors projects very costly.

• Lack of will and unconcerned attitudes of the government officials has also been categorically mentioned as major factor which delays the implementation of Environment friendly solutions.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Various recommendations were made by the participants in order to over come the constraints and meet the challenges in their endeavours. These recommendations would be broadly categorised under the following headings.

The Pro-active role of Government

• Better incentives and less stringent regulatory measures.

• Facilitation geared towards environment friendly efforts.

• Catalytic role in enhancement of institutional capacities.

The action-oriented role of NGOs and Private Sector

• Self-reliance in terms of adoption of pollution abatement technology.

• Promotion of indigenous and home-grown technologies and pollution abatement plants.

• More positive attitudes towards considerations of processes leading to sustainable growth and development.

• Sustain diversion of resources (financial) towards the improvement of technical know how and expertise to tackle various pollution problems.

• New avenues and actions for advocacy of environmental plans with mobilisation at the grass roots levels.

2.2 Second De-Brief: Peshawar & Lahore (November 16-18, 1999)

This report is aimed at providing summary of the discussions with main focus on the programmes that participants identified. It briefly reports some of the processes and practices highlighted in the discussion that deserves attention in attempts to progress towards sustainable development.

Peshawar NGOs (November 16, 1999)

The number of participants from NGOs in Peshawar was nine who contributed their experiences regarding environmental programmes in their respective NGOs. Each individual participant was persuaded to keep the focus of discussion and discourse on the key issues relevant to the NGOs own initiatives.

The discussants were then guided to deliver upon the following as per research design approved by the client.

Focussing on the achievements in major conservation and sustainable development (SD) improvements.

- The own actions of NGOs - contribution in are towards SD.

- The enabling factors - compellation and incentives.

- The process being adopted.

- Major constraints and impeding factors.

- Suggestions and recommendations for the future.

The discussions extended over two hours and each participant came up with brief description of their projects and processes. Following are the main areas of work which NGOs have undertaken to tackle environmental problems.

Pakistan Environmental Protection Foundation has planted thousand of trees in various locations of NWFP. The foundation has also initiated programme for improvement of living conditions in very poor communities living in the suburbs of Peshawar and Waliabad. They have also organised man awareness campaign from time to time against environmental degradation.

AWARE has worked in different districts of NWFP. They have identified sanitation programme as the entry point in low income communities of Peshawar and Nowshera. Fuel saving project and nursery raising projects are other ventures in village Lakaray and Teleband which are successfully underway for better environment.

Sarhad Rural Support Corporation has multisectoral programmes and work in close co-ordination with the local communities. The provision of support to the communities in terms of sensitising the people about environment is care work of this NGO. The need based approach in Kitchen Gardening and Organic farming has been adopted. Forestation and supply of drinking water are the major environmental friendly activities for the benefit of the rural communities.

Human Resource Management and Development Corporation (HRMD) has an Integrated Urban Development Programme (IUDP) and Luton and Peshawar Initiative for sustainability (LAPIS) with a group of other interested NGOs e.g. IUCN, KK and WWF. These initiatives contain environmental projects in the form of sanitation and solid waste management programmes.

Khwendo Kor's main focus is on women development. It started its work with the broad theme of women and Environment but had to refocus their endeavour putting more emphasis on socio-economic development of women. Environment is a cross cutting theme in KK's programmes. Alleviation of poverty through credit for micro-enterprise, kitchen gardening, nursing plantation and under water. Awareness creation by mobilisation of people to watch gender and environment related TV programmes is also their major activity.

National Research Development Foundations has successfully launched a project in collaboration with IUCN which they call as "Ulama and Environment". Ulama and religious leaders are being motivated to play their role in changing the attitudes and behaviour of the local people in favour of clean and hygienic environment. The foundation has succeeded in obtaining their targets in various localities of NWFP with the help of Ulama who effectively convince the people about the teaching and tenants of Islam which has stressed upon keeping the environment clean as a compelling duty on the part of all the Muslims.

PUSH FACTORS AND SIGNALS:

Pakistan Environmental Protection Foundation started their environment programme after a team visit (which included experts from Britain) to areas in the vicinity of Peshawar who reported that these areas are environmentally dirty. The initial survey of the foreign team revealed the fact that smoke and air pollution overflowing sewerage and solid waste mismanagement of the basic environmental problems adding to the miseries of already poor localities. This enabled the foundation to enter in these areas with their environment friendly programmes which also included aforestation around the degraded areas.

Sarhad Rural Support Programme is working in collaboration with IUCN , have they initiated their work with the consistent effects of IUCN team and also had technical support from IUCN Peshawar Office.

AWARE made their entry in environmental projects by donors advocacy and they termed their programmes as donor driven and have had major inputs from the consultants hired by the donor agency.

HRMD has identified their projects as their own initiatives and hence no specific push factors could be established. The development projects for health and hygiene has subsequently led to the sanitation projects and clear area initiative which included plantation and solid waste management in the catchment areas.

National Research Development Foundation have effectively mobilised the Ulama and Khatibs in mosques to motivate people for sage and healthy environment and benefits of these efforts are termed as rewards whit Muslims would get in life after death and in heaven. This successful strategy is being adopted by foundation itself and credit goes to the field workers who themselves came up with this idea of environmentally sound development.

CONSTRAINTS

The common constraints and impediments encountered by all the NGOs are following in brief.

The financial constraints to continue their projects or for the expansion and replication of projects in other areas.

The non availability of technical support and required information and know how from any quarter like federal Government and Intentional NGOs.

The settlement of refugees from Afghanistan has created the biggest hurdles in all the NGOs projects. The foreign settlers are non co-operative and have less caring attitudes towards deforestation and management of resources.

The cultural factions are still retarding involvement of women in different projects. It takes time to convince the male of the household about the need of training and awareness creation among the females of the localities about environmental issues.

Lahore NGOs (November 17, 1999)

The number of participants from NGOs in Lahore are six. Their field of activities varied from social uplift projects to the provision of loan and credit for small scale businesses. WWF has main focus on environment and sustainable development and hence they have undertaken large number of projects with central thrust on sustainable development. Their major areas in environment pollution abatement are Municipal Solid Waste Management, air and water pollution, monitoring and training workshops for the industries to tackle the industrial waste pollution.

Shirkat Gah is a prominent NGO which basically addresses the women development issues and has initiated sustainable development programmes from their platform. As indicated during discussion Shirkat Gah has women and sustainable development programmes which includes research fields projects in the coastal areas of Karachi and in Punjab, information dissemination, advocacy and publications. The major project of mangrove plantation in the coastal areas of Karachi, Korangi Creek to be specific is a vital contribution in the preservation of coastal ecosystem.

Society for the Advancement of Education has undertaken various programs in training and educating the masses in environmental issues. The NGO has developed an environmental education kit for the benefit of the trainees. Most of the trainees come from local NGOs and school teachers.

FPAP is running environmental programme along with population welfare programs in collaboration with local CBOs. The improvement in the quality of life is imperative for better environmental surroundings in household. Women in the catchement areas are encouraged to use smokeless stoves. The hazardous smoke contribute in air pollution but also has negative health impacts. Use of smokeless stoves minimizes the threats to health and environment.

BUNYAD Literacy and Community Council is actively involve with treatment of saline land in the agriculture areas of Punjab. This problems solving approach with locally developed technology has been extremely beneficial to the local farmers. Solid waste management, integrated sanitation and farming system and pit-latrines in various Districts of Punjab are some of the many endeavors by BUNYAD.

ENABLING FACTORS:

WWF is essentially an international NGO committed to the cause of preservation of endangered species and biodiversity. Their extensive role in this area is also quite visible in the context of Pakistan. The projects are being conceived and implemented in the organization itself under strategic planning.

Shirkat Gah works in close collaboration with IUCN and their main signals and processes are being communicated by IUCN with all programmes inclusive.

FPAP has also followed the NCS programmes and they were enabled to initiate their environment programmes in compliance with NCS core issue by the Ministry of Environment’s efforts in dissemination of information about population and related issues on environment.

BUNYAD has found their way in environmental issues through the indication of farmers or local stakeholders who put their problems before them and asked for their support. Hence BUNYAD’s collaboration with the Agriculture University of Faisalabad and acquired local technology for eradication of salinity from the Agriculture land and has been able to over come the problems to a certain extent.

CONSTRAINTS

The NGOs in Lahore have also identified some major constraints that has retarded their work and slowed the processes.

The lack of coordination between NGOs and Government and passive attitude at the beauracratic level.

The dearth of published data on environmental indicators and essential variables, hampers the planning for the environmental projects.

The financial support promised by the Government to local NGOs has not been fulfilled so far and is felt as major constraint in undertaking the projects.

No research based technical support is provided and vital information is not available either from the Government or other NGOs.

Lahore Industry (November 18, 1999)

Nine participants form eight industries and related institutions were present for a very illuminating discussion in Lahore.

National Environmental Consulting (NEC) Private Limited has undertaken the introduction to cleaner technologies in tannery clusters in Punjab. The main area of focus is provision of technology for cleaner production. A detailed survey has been undertaken by the NEC of the tanneries in Kasur area. Subsequently NEC came up with a big plan to achieve certain goals like information dissemination through brochure and booklets confidence building of industrialists, creating awareness and training of workers in industry, and selection of industries for audit.

Packages Limited is involved in water conservation and effluent treatment activities at the production site. They have installed primary effluent treatment plant and water recycling is being done. The final effluent and air pollution controlled plant is being recently installed.

Taufique Leather Industry, has also installed effluent treatment plant for tanneries at Kasur. For tanning industry at Sialkot, a clear production centre has been established.

Eastern Leather Company (Pvt.) Ltd. has also installed a treatment plant at their tannery site which is imported technology and claimed to be the first of its kind in individual tanneries in Pakistan in the large category

SHAKARGANG MILLS LTD in Jhang shared a very useful information regarding a model project at the mill site. The technology is indigenous and utilization of bio-compost is termed as the best way to exploit the environment polluting effluents and to improve the soil and plant health.

LAHORE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY is also playing a vital role in the creation of awareness among industry regarding industrial pollution. They hold workshops for industrialists and environmental issues are discussed comprehensively with production specific angel. This has been a fruitful venture but LCCI feel that industries response has been pathetic.

ENABLING FACTORS

The tanners are major exporters of their products and hence to comply with the international standards of product and environmental qualities, they have adopted pollution abatement technologies.

The own interest of some of the leaders and proprietors of industries like paper industry has played a major role in their environment friendly efforts.

Sugar industry is basically concerned about the soil and water conservation in the vicinity of mill and has self motivation in the installment of their pollution abatement and conservation technology.

CONSTRAINTS & CHALLENGES

The financial constraints is the biggest factor for all the industries to go for pollution abatement technologies. In the short term, they are unable to import this kind of technology from other countries because of lack of financial resources.

The non-availability of low cost technology and adequate infrastructure to support the adoption of pollution treatment technologies.

The inconsistent government policies which directly effects the business and production and has indirect bearing on the organization planning which includes planning for acquisition and expansion of pollution abatement technologies.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Following is the list of suggestions and recommendations which (in brief) participants in all three FGDs came up with.

A national network of all NGOs working for sustainable development is imperative. The sustainable development can not be achieved by isolated efforts and projects. There has to be collaborative and coordinated actions if we aim to get concrete out come.

A national institution is needed which can facilitate the NGOs in terms of provision of quantitative information, latest information about innovative approaches and technologies and can also work as a training centre to equip trainees to work for sustainable development.

The Government must also play an active role in facilitation and implementation of NGOs programmes and projects.

Afghan refugees have been identified as one of the factor which has exacerbated environmental pollution and degradation. Government must have a policy for these refugees and restrain them from the adverse activities.

The indepth research should be done for each core environmental issue and its impact on the economy should be published.

The capacity building and strengthening of CBOs is quite essential. CBOs work in communities, with high degree of commitment. Hence they must be empowered to run the environment protection projects efficiently.

The environmental issues must be covered by the media (paper and electronic) in urdu and regional languages for the benefit of the masses.

Composting system has to be introduced at mass level.

The industrial waste would be transferred into profitable product with the application of technology. Government can provide the facility in the acquisition of this technology and motivate the industrialists to invest in it as they have incentive in getting profits out of this technology.

This Annex presents the results of a content analysis of the transcripts of each of the six focus group discussions.

Content Analysis

Signals

• Community needs

• Donor’s interest

• The awareness created by environmental agencies

• NCS (UNDP developmental project, environmental clubs in schools, FAO land rehabilitation. Project, Quetta solid waste management project, irrigation project, livestock feed resources project.

Challenges & Constraints

• Scarcity of funding

• Absence of Liaison b/w private sector,

• NGOs & Government.

• Rack of will to implement NCS

• Environment perceived foreign agenda by a significant number of people they consider their essential needs, hunger, shelter and health needs to be focused first.

• Ineffective coordination b/w provincial and federal agencies,

• Consultative mechanism are slow to developed are resisted y vested interest

Recommendations

• Increased access to information technical knowledge

• Promoting an environment friendly attitude.

• NCS implementation requires reorientation of existing investment profiles

• Strengthening of existing institution & capacity building has to be addressed.

Content Analysis

Signals

• Strategy and policy of the organization.

• Demands placed by the community.

• The vision created by national conservation strategy.

Mechanism

(as identified in Health Check Section)

Challenges & Constraints

• Resistances from Community

• Lack of legislations

• Lack of technical know how

• Rack and discontinuation of funding

Recommendations

• Adoption of Environment the tiredly programmes & policy should become a part of oath for the elected representatives.

• Focus on coordination b/w various sectors working for environment.

• Strengthening of NGO’s

• NCS should be implemented.

• Working relationship b/w NGO’s and government sector needs to be strengthened.

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION – PESHAWAR

Content Analysis

Signals

• PTA.

• Govt.

• Donors

Mechanism